Posts Tagged ‘nc cattle’

Strategies For Extending The Grazing Season On Organic Farms

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Given the high price of grain, fuel and forage, it is logical to hope for a longer than normal grazing season. Although traditional pastures generally become less productive in both yield and quality later in the season, several strategies can be employed to supply forage into the fall or early winter and effectively extend the grazing season by 60 to 90 days, thus reducing the need for stored feeds. These strategies can be categorized into two major groups: stockpiling (conserving cool-season forages in late summer for use in the fall and winter), and utilizing forage crops that continue to grow into the fall and early winter.

Stockpiling Forage

Stockpiled forage is a practice that allows the forage to grow and accumulate for use at a later time. Essentially cool season forages are left to grow for the last 60 to 70 days of the growing season. This 70-day period can be achieved by terminating summer grazing or taking a last cut of hay in late July. The forage that grows during the autumn months is leafy and high in nutrition. Many farmers may “sacrifice” a few of their hay fields for fall grazing, especially if they plan to rotate into a row crop the following spring. Intensive grazing in these areas in the fall, with the accompanying manure applications, could be helpful to next year’s corn crop. At times, those new to grazing tend to overlook their hay fields and the benefits grazing would have when used as part of the overall crop rotation.

All cool season grasses and legumes can be stockpiled but not all species are adapted to stockpiling, as most tend to reduce growth in the fall due to shorter day lengths and/or loss of leaves (and therefore quality) after a frost. However, tall fescue and birdsfoot trefoil are considered excellent candidates for stockpiled forage. These two species are well adapted to the practice because they continue to grow in the fall and do not lose leaves as readily after a frost. If tall fescue is planted for grazing, make sure to purchase an endophyte-free variety. Tall fescue has been shown to produce over a ton of dry matter per acre in the fall compared to half a ton/acre from other cool season grasses. Yields can be increased by adding manure, compost, or approved nitrogen fertilizers, such as feather meal or fish emulsion, after the last grazing or hay harvest.

Since August and September are considered to be pasture shortage months, it may not be realistic for all farmers to set aside 

a portion of the summer pasture. Don’t fret; there are other options to extending the grazing season.

Fall Annuals for Grazing

There are several forage species that are not as adversely impacted by the cool fall weather and short day length. Annual forages that grow best in the fall are small grains and forage brassica crops. Winter cereal crops such as wheat, barley, triticale, or rye can provide late season grazing opportunities. Although not well documented, there may be a yield and quality benefit to mixing the various cereal crops. These grains should be planted in early to mid-August at a seeding rate of 150 lbs/acre. Cereal grains are not heavy feeders but still require adequate levels of fertility. Manure will be able to cover the fertility needs of the small grains. Grazing from fall annuals should be available in October/November and again in the early spring. Moderate grazing pressure will allow for the crop to recover and produce more forage in the spring. Small grain pastures are high in protein and low in fiber during the fall months. Crude protein levels range from 15 to 34% of dry matter.

Forage brassica is another highly productive fall annual for grazing. The standard brassica crops include turnips, rutabaga, kale, and rape. Turnip and rape are the shortest season brassica crops. Livestock can graze the stems, leaves and roots of turnips, while they just graze the stems and leaves of rape. The crop will usually be ready to graze about 65-80 days after planting. Therefore a planting date in late July or early August would be preferable. The crop grows best during periods of low temperature of 40 to 60 degrees F. Brassica crops grow best on fertile and slightly acid soils (5.3-6.8 pH). The crop does not grow well on poorly drained soils with high clay content. Turnip seed should be planted at 1.5 lbs per acre and larger rapeseed at 3-4 lbs per acre. The seed should be planted no more than one-half inch deep in rows 6 to 8 inches apart. 

Brassica crops are heavy feeders of nitrogen. Therefore an application of manure, a legume plow down, or 100 lbs/acre of another certified organic nitrogen source will be required per acre. Phosphorus and potassium requirements are similar to small grains.

Strip grazing small areas of brassica provides the most efficient utilization of the crop. This keeps the forage from becoming trampled and wasted. Grazing rape down to 6 inches allows rapid re-growth and may be re-grazed in as few as four weeks. Turnips can also be grazed twice but requires more management. During the first grazing, only the tops of the turnips should be grazed. Make sure to leave 6 inches of stubble on the top of the turnip. During the second grazing, the cows can graze both the turnip tops and the roots. Typical dry matter yields obtained in numerous university and farm trials range from 3 to 5 tons per acre.

Brassica crops should be considered “concentrates” rather than “forage” when planning the animal’s nutritional needs. 

Above-ground parts of brassica crops normally contain 20 to 25 percent crude protein, 65 to 80 percent in vitro digestible dry matter, and low fiber content. The roots contain 10 to 14 percent crude protein and 80 to 85 percent in vitro digestible dry matter. Brassica crops can produce amounts of digestible energy per acre equivalent to corn yielding 115 bushel per acre.

Since the crop contains a high concentration of protein and digestible nutrients, brassica crops should not constitute more than 75 percent of the animal’s diet. The diet should be supplemented with hay or grass pastures. It is always a good idea to introduce grazing animals to brassica pastures slowly. This will reduce chances of health disorders associated with these types of crops

Source: www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com

U.S. Cattlemen’s Association Members Complete Capitol Hill Fly-In

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

U.S. Cattlemen’s Association (USCA) representatives were in Washington, DC during the first week of November to share cattle producers’ concerns with policy-makers on a number of cattle industry issues with a primary focus on the country of origin labeling (COOL) challenge under the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Led by USCA President Jon Wooster, San Lucas, CA and USCA Director Emeritus Leo McDonnell, Columbus, MT, the group met with representatives of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee’s trade staff, the U.S. Trade Representative’s (USTR) office and U.S. House Ways and Means Committee Trade Subcommittee staff members among others.

“As the COOL challenge progresses through the WTO process we want to make certain the cattle industry is positioned with trade representatives to ensure a vigorous defense of the law,” stated McDonnell. “These meetings were important in that they help officials better understand how our industry operates as well as sharing information that will be important throughout the WTO challenge. The message delivered was a strong one that outlines USCA’s expectations and willingness to serve as a resource in the case. USCA members have a great deal of expertise on international trade issues and as this case unfolds we want to be sure that every measure is taken to protect and preserve our right to label our product domestically.”

USCA representatives also met with J. Dudley Butler, Administrator of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA). “J. Dudley Butler’s appointment to lead GIPSA ushers in a new era at the agency,” commented Wooster. “Market competition and monopolization are promised to be closely scrutinized under his administration with special attention on enforcement of antitrust laws and the upcoming joint GIPSA-DOJ workshops will add greatly to this. This was a very encouraging meeting. We’re very fortunate to have someone with his experience and expertise appointed to this position and USCA looks forward to a close working relationship with Administrator Butler.”

During a meeting with Dr. Matt Messenger of the National Center for Animal Health Programs, USCA representatives discussed ongoing issues with Texas fever tick eradication. Chuck Kiker, USCA Region V Director, Beaumont, TX said certain regions in Texas along the Mexico border still suffer from substantial fever tick issues and that the overview of the issue presented during the meeting was encouraging. “It’s quite possible that a new vaccine will emerge in the U.S. to help eradicate fever ticks. The vaccine is already in use in Mexico and the results are successful. U.S. animal health officials are working closely with the Food and Drug Administration to win approval to use this new vaccine in the U.S.,” noted Kiker.

Defending the COOL WTO case, increasing U.S. beef access to foreign markets, along with clarifications on the follow up and implementation of federal programs regarding Hurricane Ike and drought across the Southwest, were topics of discussion during the meeting with USDA Farm and Foreign Agriculture Services (FAS) officials and Under Secretary Jim Miller. “USDA FAS has its plate full handling several critical issues for U.S. cattle producers,” noted Chuck Kiker. “We are pleased and impressed with their continuing commitment to make progress on all of these issues. Hurricane Ike and the drought caused massive problems in Texas. The implementation of relief programs will ensure that livestock producers across the nationa will be able to continue their operations and overcome the devastating effects of disasters,” remarked Kiker.

USCA officials also met with USDA’s Agriculture Marketing Service (AMS) staff regarding the national mandatory beef checkoff. “This meeting was very informative,” said Wooster. “There is no doubt that Senator Jon Tester’s (D-MT) bill to modernize the beef checkoff will be instrumental in reforming the Beef Act. This measure will enhance the decades old Beef Act. It is imperative that producers engage in the process by asking their U.S. Senators to sign on as co-sponsors of Senator Tester’s legislation.”

Wooster explained that the group also participated in discussions with administrators of the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), a hot-button issue for cattle producers.

“The Secretary of Agriculture has indicated that he will be announcing his plans for a redirection of animal identification and we await that announcement. It is clear that the animal identification issue is not dead,” warned Wooster. “Despite the fact that NAIS funding was drastically slashed in the most recent Congressional spending bill, a considerable cash reserve remains at USDA that can be used to develop an animal identification system for disease mitigation programs and to initiate some type of trace-back for disease outbreaks. This cash reserve, estimated in the millions, is the result of groups failing to meet prescribed benchmarks in their grants to promote premise registrations. As a result of those failures, grant funds were withheld and remain at the disposal of USDA. There is also a concern that a mandatory identification proposal may come up based on the identification systems used in the tuberculosis and brucellosis programs for interstate shipment of cattle.”

Wooster continued, “Animal health officials are having an increasingly difficult time tracing animal disease outbreaks due to the phasing-out of historically successful animal health programs like the programs for tuberculosis and brucellosis, and due to reducing the number of cattle being identified with an official ear tag. These are serious issues that will require the engagement of cattle producers across the country.”

USCA members received an update from USDA’s Dr. Freeda Isaac and Dr. Alecia Naugle concerning Canadian cattle imported into the U.S. for a feedlot destination in Washington State. The cattle entered the U.S. earlier this year but were turned out onto a forest grazing permit, a violation of import requirements. “We learned that of the 385 head involved all but four have been gathered and tested and that the four remaining head are believed to be dead,” explained Wooster. “All of the cattle gathered tested negative for tuberculosis. We appreciate USDA’s aggressive actions with this matter. Officials indicated that enforcement actions and remedies are ongoing and they are taking these violations very seriously.”

Meetings were also held on several current and forthcoming international trade issues. There was emphasis that cattle and beef need to be included under the special rules required for perishable and cyclical agricultural products as has been done in some of the trade agreements passed under the last Congress.

“I want to thank the U.S. Cattlemen’s Association members and supporters who participated in this fly-in,” said Wooster. In addition to Wooster, McDonnell and Kiker, Brian Malaer, Harwood, TX, Hollis “Peanut” Gilfillian, Stowell, TX and Jess Peterson, Washington, DC also attended.

“I also want to thank the Obama Administration officials, agency staff, and the Congressional staff who took the time to meet with the USCA delegation,” noted Wooster. “These meetings were extremely productive and we greatly appreciate the time and information provided in the meetings.”

“In a short period of time USCA has established itself as a respected voice for cattle producers on Capitol Hill,” continued Wooster. “This is the fourth fly-in in which USCA has led a delegation of U.S. cattle producers to Washington, DC. We have achieved a level of access that is unprecedented. Our approach is one of having a full-time representative for the industry in Washington, DC supported by regular visits from producers themselves. I encourage every rancher to get involved with USCA and become part of shaping the future of our industry.”

Established in March 2007, USCA is committed to concentrating its efforts in Washington, DC to enhance and expand the cattle industry’s voice on Capitol Hill. USCA has a full-time presence in Washington, giving cattle producers across the country a strong influence on policy development.

Source: www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com

Jolley: Dr. Jerry Spears Talks About Distillers Grains & Trace Minerals

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Anytime you make a significant change in the content of your cattle rations, you’re risking the health of your animals. Adding distillers grains without knowing the nutritional makeup of the product could cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Dr. Jerry Spears of North Carolina State University is an expert on trace minerals and their effects on rumen health. Minerals play a vital role in cattle health. An inadequate supply can inhibit forage digestion, reproductive performance, the immune system, and

harm the development of bones, muscle, and teeth in calves.

Trace mineral deficiencies might be one of the most unrecognized problems in the cattle industry. Ranchers often don’t see specific symptoms of a trace mineral deficiency. A Texas A&M study showed trace element deficiencies impacted production in even the best managed herds more than previously recognized.

Dr. Spears commented about adding distillers grains to a feed ration, expressing concern about the variation in nutritional content. One of the main concerns, he noted, was sulfur content.

“Sulfur content can vary greatly from batch-to-batch,” he cautioned. “It’s directly related to the sulfuric acid that’s used in processing.”

“A higher sulfur content can reduce absorption of copper and selenium,” he warned, “and lead to some cattle health problems. Some DG’s can add a high level of iron, too, leading to an absorption problem with zinc and copper.”

Copper deficiency causes reduced weight gains in cattle and impaired immune systems, too. It has an increased detrimental effect on calves, often causing diarrhea and poor response to vaccinations.

Selenium deficiency can cause white muscle disease, or nutritional myodegeneration. Healthy, rapidly growing calves will show signs of weakness, stilted gait or stiffness. More severe cases might show as an inability to nurse and swallow, or pneumonia.

Another problem caused by high sulfur content, he said, was polioencephalomalacia, a disease that causes somnolence, blindness, ataxia, head pressing, circling and terminal coma. This condition is most likely to occur in feedlot cattle.

Zinc is an important component of an animal’s ability to fight off disease. Scientists label deficiency as an immunosuppressant, meaning vaccinations are less effective and other increasingly expensive medications must be used to help a sick calf recover.

Distillers grains are also good sources of phosphorus. Phosphorus can be deficient or marginal in some grazing situations and using distillers as a protein and energy supplement for grazing cattle will provide an available source of this mineral.

Distillers grains remain a low cost, high nutrient resource that can be used effectively. Like any ingredient that’s part of a well-balanced cattle ration, though, its nutritional make-up must be carefully assessed and the proper additives should be considered to maintain a balanced the diet when necessary.

Source: www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com