Posts Tagged ‘nc angus beef’

When Do I Cull A Cow From My Cow-Calf Herd?

Thursday, April 15th, 2010
Grass Fed Beef

Grass Fed Beef

Culling decisions can significantly impact the bottom line for cow-calf producers. Many producers are not sure when they should cull a cow from their herds. Disposition, reproductive rate, feed costs, poor performance, lameness and undesirable udder traits are the important factors in making the decision to cull a cow from the herd.

As a former dairy farmer, I feel that animals with undesirable dispositions (high strung, easily excitable) are dangerous and should be immediately culled. These animals can easily cause injury to people and animals. Is it worth it for the owner and/or employees to risk getting injured by keeping this animal in the herd? Disposition is a heritable trait! Animals who do not respect electric and/or permanent fences can be a “major head ache” because they are constantly breaking out of pastures.

These animals consume significant amounts of unproductive time repairing fences and chasing the animals to get them back into the pasture. The bottom line is that these animals should be culled ASAP from the herd.

One of the most important factors that impact the profitability in a cow calf operation is reproductive rate. A productive cow is expected to produce a calf at least once a year. Open (not pregnant) cows are a drain on resources. They consume feed, forage, and other resources without producing a marketable calf to contribute to expense payments. Cows that calve outside of a controlled calving season are also potential culls, particularly when feed and forage supplies are running short. Late calving cows should be examined closely as well, because they have less opportunity to breed back to stay within a controlled breeding season.

Farm management economists have estimated that feed costs are approximately $400/cow/year. Cows that are open at the end of the breeding season should be at the top of the cull list. Many producers have taken the position that “Well, if a cow does not get bred this year, I will keep her for another year and then see if we can get her bred. If I can not get her bred next year, then I will sell her.” Can a producer afford to spend $400 to feed an open cow for a year in hopes that the cow will get pregnant the following year?

Cows exhibiting poor calf performance (bottom one-third of the herd for calf 205-day adjusted weaning weights) over the first and second calving seasons generally do not significantly improve performance in future calving seasons (third and subsequent calving seasons). Poor calf performance is usually the result of inferior genetics, poor dam milk production, calf sickness or a combination of these factors. Cows transmitting inferior genetics to their calves should be at the top of the list of animals to be culled. However, if poor calf performance is due in large part to calf sickness and not associated with the dam, then the dam may still have a productive future in the herd.

Herd records help provide the owner with production data that the owner may use to make informed culling decisions. Without production records, culling decisions are based on the owner’s memory of the dam and conformation of the calf. As a result, owners may be selling offspring from their most productive animals due to the lack of records.

Undesirable conformation characteristics can lead to culling an animal. Poor feet and legs (broken down pasterns and lack of foot angle) cause lameness and reduced mobility which leads to reduced grazing. This results in decreased performance, decreased reproductive efficiency (less likely to show signs of estrus), weight loss and increased veterinary costs (foot rot). An udder that has a level floor with normal sized teats makes it easy for the calf to nurse. Cows with abnormal teat size (long balloon shaped teats) and/or a sloping udder floor tend to have pendulous udders. This makes it harder for the calf to nurse which may result in lower milk consumption and lower weaning weights.

The timing of selling a cull cow is a marketing decision. Cull cow price levels and seasonal trends should be taken into consideration when deciding when to sell cull cows. When cull cow prices are trending upward, it is often advantageous to wait to market cows if the increasing values can cover added feed expenses from holding over cull cows. If a producer has a thin cull cow and an abundant supply of grass, he may consider keeping the cow in order that the cow will gain weight and sell for a higher price. Conversely, if a producer is short of feed, the cull cow should be marked immediately once the cow has been determined open. When cull cow prices are trending downward, it is advisable to market cull cows in a timely manner before more money is spent on cow maintenance.

Cow culling strategies impact calf quality and quantity and profitability of the cow-calf operation. By making informed culling decisions, producers will be able to maintain and enhance herd performance and increase herd profitability.

Source: www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com

Angus News: Selection Made Simple In The Midwest

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

 

Angus Beef

Angus Beef

Doug Rueber was 12 years old when his father first bought a few Angus cows in 1962. Back then, the Ruebers were impressed with the docile Angus breed and its ability to deliver growth, carcass and maternal results — so much so, Doug and his wife, Marcia, continue to raise Angus cattle nearly 48 years later.

With part-time help from their nephew Bob James, the family sells about 50 bulls a year from their Arlington, Iowa, operation. Doug says the key to their success — besides Angus genetics — is the family’s long-term vision and focus on the end product.

 “If you’re going to raise cattle, you’ve got to be in it for the long haul,” Doug says.

That philosophy drove him toward the American Angus Association®’s genomic-enhanced expected progeny differences (EPDs) for carcass traits. The high-accuracy EPDs incorporate Association pedigree, carcass and ultrasound performance data with genomic profile results to produce EPDs for carcass merit.

The Association’s Angus Genetics Inc. (AGI) — through its partnership with Merial’s IGENITY® — provides the genomic-enhanced carcass trait EPDs along with Angus-specific profile scores for seven additional traits beyond carcass.

Doug says the technology has provided a convenient way to make genetic progress in a shorter time frame than traditionally possible.

 “We’ve always been interested in trying to focus on carcass traits,” he says. “When you put marbling and tenderness together you have a really good eating experience, and that’s what we shoot for.”

But aiming for that goal can be a somewhat slow process, Doug admits.

Genomic-enhanced technology implemented into a weekly carcass National Cattle Evaluation (NCE) speeds the process considerably, says Dr. Sally Northcutt, Association genetic research director.

 “Incorporating the high-accuracy IGENITY profile for Angus provides a low-cost way to significantly increase accuracy beyond an animal’s own records and several progeny — at any time in the calf’s life,” she says. “In the case of a female, using the profile may be the equivalent of nearly a lifetime of production in terms of data on her progeny.”

Better selection tools allow cattlemen to select for a more consistent product — they just have to be willing to jump in and use them, Doug says.

 “It’s kind of like buying a new computer. If you keep waiting until the next latest, greatest model comes out, you’ll never jump in and buy one,” he says. “The DNA technology is expanding about that fast, but if you didn’t ever start, you’d miss out. And anything we can do to get a more consistent product is important.”

On the farm

Submitting samples is relatively hassle-free, Doug says. “It’s just a few more minutes while you’re running a trip through,” he says. “It just takes one person.”

Blood samples on FTA cards are the preferred method of collection. After collecting samples, Doug submits a profile order and mails the samples to AGI. In a matter of weeks, he receives carcass EPDs and profile scores for other traits where EPDs are not yet available — like tenderness.

Bill Bowman, AGI president, says the information benefits all Angus producers, regardless of herd size or location. “Producers can be confident this technology will help to improve their selection decisions, to indicate the genetic merit of their animals, and to increase the accuracy of EPDs.”

If producers do that, they’ll have a more consistent, more dependable product for consumers, Doug says. “The more we work at trying to incorporate this, in the long run it should increase the value of our bulls and females that we sell.”

Bottomline benefits

The Angus-specific profile costs $65 — but Doug suggests producers consider the cost from a longer-term perspective.

 “You invest in something today knowing it will increase the value for your product down the road,” he says. “It’s helped us with our bull sales this year, but it’s more than a sales gimmick. It’s trying to breed in a solid, consistent genetic package for the customer.”

That’s how it will pay for itself in the long-run, Doug says.

 “It’s not going to be a magic wand that’s going to pay big dollars tomorrow, but if you’re in it for the long haul, the average bull goes out and sires 100-125 calves in his lifetime in commercial operations. So you’re talking somewhere between 50 cents and 75 cents a calf for knowing the DNA of your herd bull out there. That’s less than the cost of a plastic tag to put in their ear.

 “When you start looking at it that way, it’s not a big cost per animal,” he continues. “There’s places you can cut corners in tough times, but knowing what your genetics are isn’t a place to be cutting corners.”

Source: www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com

Winter of 2010 May Have Lingering Effects

Monday, March 15th, 2010

The winter of 2010 is being recorded as one of the most severe in recent memory. Some areas have been hit harder than others, but the effects of the cold and snow may impact your business the rest of the year.

For instance, this year’s corn crop may already be affected by the weather in Texas. The optimal time to start planting corn in the Gulf Coast and Central Texas regions is about the third or fourth week of February, with planting continued into mid- to late-March, according to Travis Miller, Texas AgriLife Extension Service agronomist.

“But the Gulf Coast has been (too) wet for four months or more,” Miller said. “Central Texas is pretty much the same. No field work has been done; no fertilizing, no land preparation. There are lots of weeds in the fields. We’re very close to planting time and absolutely no field work has been done.”

Miller said if a few weeks of clear weather were to come soon, producers could move into the fields and get some land preparation done. If the planting is delayed by only a couple of weeks, there probably wouldn’t be much detriment to this year’s crop, though there is some risk associated with late planting.

“Late planting always increases the risk of heat and drought injury when we tend to have dry and hot weather mid-summer,” he said.

After an early winter decline, cash corn prices have recovered to the $3.60 per bushel level. That puts corn into cattle feeding rations around the $7 per hundredweight level.

Despite recent gains, grain analysts expect the corn market will struggle to continue higher in the near term. That’s because large U.S. supplies and favorable South American crop weather have put pressure on the market, and demand has been called lackluster. Corn growers are also expected to increase sales of stored grain due to the market’s recent rally.

Certainly there is ample time for field work in the major U.S. corn growing areas before there is concern for a shortened crop in 2010. But this winter has also affected the price and performance of livestock that is produced with corn.

Since the market low of $80 in December, cash fed cattle prices have rallied $9 to $10. Much of that price rally is directly due to the severe winter as carcass weights are running 10 to 15 pounds below year ago levels, helping keep beef tonnage down.

The weather has also delayed placements of cattle into feedyards, which, in turn, is likely to reduce overall beef production for the year. That may translate into better prices for beef, assuming consumer demand is adequate.

Restaurants, especially on the East Coast where record snows hit last week, report dramatic declines in business, while retail outlets saw an increase in sales as consumers hunkered down. As the weather warms restaurants are hoping business picks up again. If so, demand for beef and other meats could see a significant boost that would also be supportive of prices.

Source: www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com