Posts Tagged ‘grass fed angus beef nc’

Study: Plants Ease Antibiotic Risk On Farms

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Many farmers grow grass or other plant buffers to control erosion or capture herbicides from their fields.

Now, University of Missouri scientists say there’s another reason to plant them. They say the buffers can mitigate the potential risk of routine use of antibiotics in livestock.

Keith Goyne, an assistant professor of soil chemistry, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that the buffers can prevent antibiotics from leaching into water resources.

Some scientists are concerned that antibiotic use in livestock could lead to antibiotic-resistant diseases in humans.

The researchers found that buffer strips can reduce up to 80 percent of antibiotics in an animal’s manure, and that certain plants are especially good at dissipating the substances

Source: http://www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com

Stocker Cattle: Finding The Right Information

Monday, February 15th, 2010

A few of the newer technologies that come to mind as potentially valuable tools for stocker operators include internet-based news and educational materials. There are many other technologies that can improve specific aspects of production and information about each of them can be found on the “web.” This article will focus on using internet-based communication tools to become more effective at finding and interpreting educational materials.

Almost all of the newer communication tools are based on the internet. In fact, an internet search engine can yield an amazing amount of information pertaining to a fairly simple search. For example, searching the phrase “stocker cattle production” on one popular search engine yields 1,130 links. Searching that same phrase on Google (the most widely-used search engine) yields nearly 68,000 links. So, there is an amazing amount of material to be found on the internet. However, finding material that is actually relevant to the specific question in mind can be difficult. As internet use continues to increase in rural areas and in production agriculture, it will become more important to know how to concentrate time on productive use of it.

The best way to start sorting through the internet clutter is by developing the right query. A “query” refers to what is typed into the search engine. Guides for developing the right query are available for each search engine. They explain their individual features and show how to search for more specific information by refining an original search. A general concept to keep in mind is that entering more key words or phrases will generally focus the links or “hits.”

After focusing in on the appropriate links, it can still be difficult, and time consuming, to decide which material actually addresses the original question. It is important to keep in mind that material on the internet is generated from across the world. Searching for information about grazing wheat can return information from Oklahoma or Russia. So, always look at the source and make sure the information is appropriate for the environment in which it will be implemented.

Legitimacy and reliability can also be an issue with material located through a general internet search. Make sure to check multiple sources and question a site that gives information inconsistent with several other sites. The best way to combat the issue of misinformation is to go directly to a trusted source. University Extension and industry association websites are places to find information backed by research and field trials. Also, getting information from these websites will ensure that information is specific to the local environment. Visit www.mscattlemen.org or http://msucares.com/livestock/beef for beef cattle production material specific to the state of Mississippi. Other internet based communication tools include e-mail, podcasts, video training modules, blogs and social media sites. E-mail is a great way to share information with other producers or to communicate with industry representatives and generally accomplish day-to-day business. Another great feature of e-mail is the multitude of newsletters that can be received on a regular basis. Some great examples of e-mail news are the “Monday Memo” from the Mississippi Cattlemen’s Association, the Mississippi Beef Cattle Improvement Association monthly newsletter and the “Weekly Wrap” and the “Cattle Market Notes” from the MSU department of Agricultural Economics.

Podcasts (audio and/or video) and video training modules are a good way to obtain non-text information that can be viewed or listened to while multitasking. One crucial requirement for using these medias will be a relatively high-speed connection. A good podcast example is the weekly podcast available through the MSU department of Agricultural Economics which provides an update on market activity and time-sensitive production information. Video training modules for Beef Quality Assurance and Master Cattle Producer certification can be found at the MSU beef cattle Extension website listed above.

Blogs that provide timely news and information concerning beef cattle production are plentiful. Many are generated by university Extension personnel while others are kept by online magazines and industry support businesses. While this type of information comes fast and often, special care should be taken to evaluate it for accuracy and validity. Check the credentials of the people writing them and their objectives. Social media sites like Facebook, MySpace and Twitter are likely the fastest growing method for information exchange. These sites provide a free platform for building communities of people, from across the country and world, with common interests. Each of these networks has communities devoted to production animal agriculture and specific sectors within it. One of the most important benefits of these websites is the ability to network with a wider scope of producers and consultants that can help grow an enterprise.

Admittedly, these internet-based resources require some basic knowledge of computer technologies. However, it is relatively easy to learn them. Even though the average age of beef cattle producers might lead some to believe that these tools are underutilized, that does not seem to be the case. For those intimidated by these technologies, consider at least trying them. Their simplicity will be surprising and the rewards can be extremely beneficial.

Source: http://www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com

Weekly Cattle Market Wrap

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Live cattle futures moved higher this week despite limited direction from cash trade. Smaller supplies and a storm brewing in the northern feeding region proved a greater market force than lower to even cash fed cattle and boxed beef. Live Cattle closing prices on Friday (with the change from last week’s close in parentheses): February $87.43 (+1.63); April $90.40 (+1.03); June $88.10 (+0.27); August $87.35 (+0.02); October $89.85 (-0.13); December $90.78 (+0.28).

Higher corn prices early in the week and lower live cattle futures pushed feeder contracts lower this week. Feeder cattle ended the week on an upswing but this could not overcome the early week losses. In previous weeks a noticeable premium had been in place for the March, April and May contracts when compared to their seasonal average, indicating a supply/demand imbalance. Last fall the lack of available wheat pasture kept a lid on demand in the closing months of 2009. Since then, reports indicate the situation has been improving and buyers were in search of feeder cattle – spurred on by lower corn – but that imbalance appears to have worked itself out of late. Feeder Cattle futures closing prices on Friday (with change from last week’s close in parentheses) were as follows: March $98.33 (-0.55); April $99.68 (-1.28); May $101.18 (-0.63); August $102.60 (-0.25); September $102.30 (-0.45); October $101.95 (-0.55).

Corn futures moved up to start the week, but the momentum was short lived as a strengthening US dollar and other outside markets put pressure on the a already fragile corn market. The nearby March contract closed at $3.51 ½, down 5 cents from last week; the December contract was at $3.87, down 3 ¾ cents.
www.cattlenetwork.com

www.PerryFarmsGrassFedBeef.com